Twitter, Google and Facebook Conspire Together To Attack All Non-ANTIFA Political Persons

SHARE THIS NEWS ON SOCIAL MEDIA: Share

SILICON VALLEY'S EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION.png

 

TWITTER, GOOGLE & FACEBOOK CONFIRM THAT THEY ARE DNC POLITICAL TOOLS

TWITTER, GOOGLE & FACEBOOK CONSPIRE TO USE THE TOP 8 CIA PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE TACTICS TO TRY TO RIG ELECTIONS

GOOGLE'S PSY-OPS.png

Twitter Suspends Ohio Republican Congressional Candidate – Chris DePizzo – After Tweeting About Democrat Rival

 by Joshua Caplan

Amid Project Veritas’ bombshell report on Twitter’s discriminatory practices against Conservatives, the social media platform allegedly suspended Ohio Republican congressional candidate Chris DePizzo after simply  tweeting about his Democrat rival Rep. Tim Ryan.

ACTForAmerica Grassroots Director Thomas Hern first drew attention to Depizzo’s Twitter suspension, tweeting on Sunday, “Twitter just suspended Chris Depizzo a conservative candidate for Congress in Ohio for quote tweeting his opposition. Twitter is literally trying to rig elections in favor of liberals.”

Twitter just suspended Chris Depizzo a conservative candidate for Congress in Ohio for quote tweeting his opposition.

Twitter is literally trying to rig elections in favor of liberals.

Please RT this tweet, we cannot let the left silence our voice!

— Thomas Hern (@ThomasMHern) January 15, 2018

According to Hern, DePizzo was suspended from Twitter after calling out “liberal media darling” Ryan for discussing the Democrat Party in Iowa and New Hampshire, while ignore the concerns of his own district.

These are the tweets that got Chris DePizzo suspended. pic.twitter.com/M971fLGuMW

— Thomas Hern (@ThomasMHern) January 15, 2018

The Gateway Pundit independently confirmed congressional candidate Chris DePizzo’s Twitter account @DePizzoForOhio is indeed suspended.

Following the suspension, a “#FreeDepizzo” Twitter account was created to raise awareness for the move.

“Help support republican congressional candidate Chris DePizzo (@DePizzoForOhio)! He’s been banned from Twitter for over 24 hours with no explanation from @TwitterSupport!”, tweeted the #FreeDepizzo Monday.

Help support republican congressional candidate Chris DePizzo (@DePizzoForOhio)! He's been banned from Twitter for over 24 hours with no explanation from @TwitterSupport! Support Chris here: https://t.co/MCLoqJWY2Y pic.twitter.com/5CvOxBHFdF

— #FreeDepizzo (@freedepizzo) January 16, 2018

 

Sex sting: ‘Hundreds’ at Twitter tracking & storing ‘d*ck pics,’ Project Veritas says

Get short URL

 

© Robert Galbraith / Reuters

In undercover interviews with Twitter staff, Project Veritas has alleged that hundreds of employees are tasked with searching for graphic user photos. This data is then stored – indefinitely.

For anyone who thinks the information they send over Twitter is somehow protected from third-party snooping, think again. In a series of interviews caught on hidden camera in early January, Clay Haynes, senior network security engineer, dispels those notions once and for all.

Read more

© Global Look PressTwitter ‘happy’ to hand over Trump’s direct messages & deleted tweets to DOJ – Project Veritas VIDEO

“I’ve seen way more penises than I’ve ever wanted to see in my life,” Haynes confides to an undercover journalist with Project Veritas.

When asked to elaborate, Haynes says the graphic material is found on “DMs (direct messages), tweets…”

“Lots of d*cks,” he emphasized.

Interestingly, it is not the work of a robot to automatically single out the offensive content, but rather large teams of humans devoted to the task. “There’s teams dedicated to it,” Haynes confirms. “I mean, we’re talking, we’re talking three or four… at least, three or four hundred people.”

“Yes, they’re paid to look at d*ck pics.”

According to the founder of Project Veritas, James O’Keefe, users have no way to protect themselves from Twitter violations of privacy.

“Twitter has pages and pages of rules and requirements, including its comprehensive terms of service that protects Twitter from you,” O’Keefe noted. “But you have nothing that protects you from Twitter.”

This boils down to the ultimate question: How much information does Twitter have, and what are they doing with it?

According to another Twitter employee, a direct messaging engineer introduced as Pranay Singh, quite a lot.

Read more

© veritasvisuals / YouTubeTwitter ‘shadow bans’ undesirable voices, censors free speech – Project Veritas exec to RT

“All your sex messages and your, like, dick pics are on my server now… All your illegitimate wives and, like, all the girls you’ve been f*cking around with, they’re on my server now,”Singh boasted.

“I’m going to send it to your wife, she’s going to use it in your divorce,” he added, jokingly.

But as the axiom says, with every joke there is a hint of truth.

O’Keefe commented on this particularly jocular, cocky stance from many Twitter engineers, who “seemed to have a more cavalier attitude about user privacy. It is almost like the whole culture at Twitter is about abusing and laughing at users.”

Singh emphasized a terrible truth about all of the vast amounts of personal data that Twitter hoovers up on a daily basis: it never goes away. “Like, they are always on there,” Singh claims.

And this fits in with Twitter’s particular business model, which collects user information and sells it to businesses, advertisers, and other interested parties, it appears.

“Even after you send [the information], people are analyzing them, to see what you’re interested in, to see what you’re talking about, and they sell that data.” When asked to clarify what sort of information Twitter makes available, Singh said, “everything.”

Even direct messages are free game. As O’Keefe explained, “this is not your run-of-the-mill big data. This is personal and specific, and that has a high premium for advertisers.”

It is almost like the whole culture at Twitter is about abusing and laughing at users. -James O'Keefe, Project Veritas

Another Twitter engineer, Mihai Florea, who has been with the company for three years, admitted that selling data to advertisers is “how we make most of our money.”

Florea said that users are “paying for the right to use our website with your data basically… And it’s the same way with every free website.”

Twitter has rejected the claims put forward in the Project Veritas investigation.

"We do not proactively review DMs. Period," a company spokesperson told BuzzFeed. "A limited number of employees have access to such information, for legitimate work purposes, and we enforce strict access protocols for those employees."

READ MORE: Washington Post reporter admits ‘Russiagate’ story a ‘f*cking crap shoot’ in Project Veritas video

It must be noted that the work of Project Veritas has not been without criticism for the methods it employs.

In 2010, O’Keefe was sentenced to three years’ probation, 100 hours of community service, and a $1,500 fine for entering then-Senator Mary Landrieu’s (D-La.) office on false pretenses.

O’Keefe and three colleagues were arrested by federal authorities at Landrieu’s office on allegations of phone-tampering.

 

SHARE THIS NEWS ON SOCIAL MEDIA: Share

They posted on the same topic

Trackback URL : https://congressionalreview.net/index.php?trackback/298

This post's comments feed

Aperçu de site